For Problem R-1:
A
rotation, as a transformation on
,
has no eigenvectors. (Later we'll see that it does have eigenvectors
if complex numbers are allowed.)
A reflection in
has two eigenspaces (line of
eigenvectors), one along the mirror line and one perpendicular
to the mirror line.
A shear has just one eigenspace, and it doesn't help to allow complex numbers.
For Problem R-2:
(a)
, so we want
and
.
Therefore we should use
.
(b) For the same reason, let
.
For Problem R-3:
To review: Writing
for an elementary matrix, when
we do successive elementary row operations starting from
we are making
,
, etc.
So if
is the end result after
elementary row operations,
then
, where
.
We know
is invertible since
can be undone by the
inverses of the elementary row operations:
.
(a) If
is row-reduced to
then
as just
explained. The isomorphism is simply
, since
is invertible (so is an isomorphism) and takes each
column of
to the corresponding column of
.
One of you suggested that this point of view is another good way to see why linear relations among columns are preserved by row reduction even though the column space is changed: The column space is changed isomorphically!
(b) Since the isomorphism in (a) takes columns of
to
corresponding columns of
, a selection of columns that
makes a basis for the column space of
corresponds to the
same thing for
.