For Problem W-1:
Remember, for
GF
, any
-dimensional vector space
over
has
elements, even if the vector space is a
subspace of some sort. Here we are working inside
.
Following the suggestion, for the first row we just need to
choose a nonzero vector, so there are
possible choices.
The first row spans a 1-dimensional subspace of
with
elements.
For the second row, we can choose any triple that avoids this
1-dimensional subspace, so there are
possibilities
for the second row. The first two rows together are linearly
independent, so together they span a 2-dimensional subspace of
with
elements.
For the third row, we can choose any triple that avoids this
2-dimensional subspace, so there are
possibilities.
Putting these together, we have
possible matrices. (It is OK to multiply here even though each choice depends on the preceding choices, because the number of possibilities for each choice does not depend on the preceding choices.)
For
this gives
invertible matrices.
For Problem W-2:
(a) One way:
.
Although this is just one example, you can see that the general
principle is this: If
is a diagonal matrix with diagonal
entries
then
is a diagonal
matrix with diagonal entries
.
Of course, this idea works for other functions in place of
.
This is another illustration of how the diagonal entries of a
diagonal matrix work independently of one another.
(b) Notice that the powers of
are
.
Then
. Collecting terms we get
, which
we recognize as the rotation matrix
with
.
Note. This is a matrix version of Euler's formula about complex
numbers:
, the
complex number representing a rotation by
. Putting
gives the famous formula
.
You might have seen this in Math 33B. Complex numbers are the
subject of Math 132.
(c) This is easier. By the Golden Rule, the powers of
are obtained by successively ``sliding the rows down'' and its fourth
power is the zero matrix. Therefore
zero matrices, so we get
For Problem W-3:
In each case we want to express
as a linear
combination of
and
. Although it is
possible to extend the basis and work in
, it seems
simplest just to stay in
and use unknown coefficients.
By the Golden Rule,
rotates
downwards one position.
For (a):
,
,
This gives three equations in
and the same for
, so use the two easiest equations in each case.
We get
,
,
,
.
So
.
As a check,
is a rotation by
, so
.
Therefore we should expect
, which does turn out to be
true. (Although we haven't discussed it,
imitates
insofar as such algebraic properties are concerned.)
For (b):
,
,
This gives three equations in
and the same for
, so again use the two easiest equations in each case.
We get
,
,
,
. So
.
Again, it can be checked that
.
For Problem W-4:
(a) In the opposite direction, to go from the standard basis to
the given nonstandard basis the matrix is
.
Then the answer is
.
As a check,
and
.
(b) Following the suggestion,
is as in part (a) and
, giving
.
Check:
,
,
An alternate method: We want
with
and
. We can put
these together using the idea that ``columns of the matrix on the
right work independently'' in a matrix product:
. This says
with
as in the first solution. Now we solve by
multiplying both sides on the right by
, again getting
the solution
.