next up previous
Next: About this document ... Up: s_complete Previous: s_complete

3. Problems

Problem S-1. State and prove a simple correspondence between closure systems and closure operators on the same set.



Problem S-2. Prove this fact due to Tarski:

Theorem. Let $ L$ be a complete lattice and let $ f:L\rightarrow L$ be isotone (i.e., order-preserving). Then $ f$ has a fixed point. In other words, there is an element $ p \in L$ with $ f(p) = p$. (Suggestion: Let $ A = \{x \in L: f(x) \geq x\}$ and let $ p = \sup A$.)



Problem S-3. The completion by cuts CC$ (P)$ of a partially ordered set $ P$ is the lattice of closed subsets of $ P$ under the polarity $ (P,P, \leq )$. It can be shown that $ P$ is isomorphically embedded in CC$ (P)$ by $ p \mapsto ( p ] = \{q \in P: q \leq p\}$, with all existing meets and joins preserved. Draw diagrams of the completion by cuts of the two partially ordered sets shown in Figure [*]. Notice that the two middle elements in the second diagram are not comparable. (Suggestion: Start by identifying the closures of singletons. Their meets become set intersections. Joins can be found dually.)

Figure: Two partially ordered sets
text/edir/cc.eps



Problem S-4. Find a simple description (up to isomorphism) of the completion by cuts of the chain of rational numbers.



Problem S-5. For these contexts $ (X,Y,\rho)$, describe the closed subsets in these examples, stating whether your description is both a necessary and sufficient condition or just necessary, and giving proof where asked:

(a) $ X =$   R (the reals), $ Y$ is the set of all continuous functions $ f:$R$ \rightarrow$   R, and $ x \rho f$ means $ f(x) = 0$. Prove your description of the $ X$-closed subsets.

(b) $ X = Y =$R$ ^ 3$ and $ x \rho y$ means $ x \cdot y \geq 0$.



Problem S-6. In the context $ (X,Y,\rho)$, the statement that a particular subset $ A$ of $ X$ is closed actually has the force of an existence statement and so can be highly nontrivial. Specifically, if $ A$ is closed, then for each $ x \not \in A$ there exists $ y \in Y$ such that $ a \rho y$ for all $ a \in A$ but not $ x \rho y$. Write such existence statements in these more specific contexts from §[*], using your knowledge of what the closed subsets of $ X$ are:

(a) Example 2(a).

(b) Example 4(a).

(c) Example 7(a).


next up previous
Next: About this document ... Up: s_complete Previous: s_complete
Kirby A. Baker 2003-02-05