Use the Mean Value theorem to prove
for all ; see the proof of Theorem 19.6.
Show is uniformly continuous on .
Let . By the mean value theorem, there exists between and such that
But for any , so taking absolute values, we get
Given , we can just set . If , then by (1), we have
Let for and .
By the product rule and chain rule,
We have
By the squeeze theorem (which still applies to limits of functions by using the sequential definition of limits), since as , we see that is differentiable at and .
Let so that . Then
for all . Thus, , but .
Let be a function defined on an open interval containing . Show exists if and only if there is a function defined on such that
""
Assume exists; that is, the limit
exists. Let
(You can figure this out by just solving for in the equation they give you. Also, it doesn't matter what the value of is as long as you define it.) Then it's easy to check that
so it remains to check that . By limit laws, it exists and
""
Suppose there exist a number and a function such that
By limit laws again is differentiable at with
The most common mistake I saw was trying to do something like this to try to show that :
Thus, solving gives .
The issue with this is that the argument only says this: if exists, then it must be . However, you need to show that exists to begin with. In other words, you can't just take limits on both sides and solve. The easiest way to do this is to use limit laws, which tells you that the limit exists and tells you have to compute the limit--you kill two birds with one stone.
This argument can be fixed, though it requires a little bit of work. See the following exercise.
Assume that are sequences such that and converge. Show that also converges.