Spring 2019 - Problem 2

measure theory, weak convergence

Let μ\mu be a Borel probability measure on [0,1]\br{0, 1} that has no atoms (this means that μ({t})=0\mu\p{\set{t}} = 0 for any t[0,1]t \in \br{0, 1}). Let also μ1,μ2,\mu_1, \mu_2, \ldots be Borel probability measures on [0,1]\br{0, 1}. Assume that μn\mu_n converges to μ\mu in the weak-* topology. Denote F(t)=μ([0,t])F\p{t} = \mu\p{\br{0, t}} and Fn(t)=μn([0,t])F_n\p{t} = \mu_n\p{\br{0, t}} for each n1n \geq 1 and t[0,1]t \in \br{0, 1}. Prove that FnF_n converges uniformly to FF.

Solution.

Let {fn}n,{gn}n\set{f_n}_n, \set{g_n}_n be continuous functions such that fnχ[0,t]gnf_n \leq \chi_{\br{0,t}} \leq g_n for all nn and so that fnf_n increases to χ[0,t)\chi_{\pco{0,t}} and gng_n decreases to χ[0,t]\chi_{\br{0,t}} by taking piecewise linear functions. Then

fkdμnμn([0,t])fkdμ    fkdμlim infnμn([0,t])lim supnμn([0,t])gkdμ,\begin{gathered} \int f_k \,\diff\mu_n \leq \mu_n\p{\br{0, t}} \leq \int f_k \,\diff\mu \\ \implies \int f_k \,\diff\mu \leq \liminf_{n\to\infty} \mu_n\p{\br{0,t}} \leq \limsup_{n\to\infty} \mu_n\p{\br{0,t}} \leq \int g_k \,\diff\mu, \end{gathered}

by weak-* convergence. We can then apply monotone convergence on the left-most integral and dominated convergence on the right-most integral to get

μ([0,t))lim infnμn([0,t])lim supnμn([0,t])μ([0,t]).\mu\p{\pco{0, t}} \leq \liminf_{n\to\infty} \mu_n\p{\br{0,t}} \leq \limsup_{n\to\infty} \mu_n\p{\br{0,t}} \leq \mu\p{\br{0, t}}.

Since μ\mu has no atoms, these are all equalities, so FnF_n converges pointwise to FF. To prove pointwise convergence, let ε>0\epsilon > 0. Since FF is continuous, it is uniformly continuous, so let δ>0\delta > 0 be as in the definition of uniform continuity. Then by compactness, there exist 0=t0<t1<<tN=10 = t_0 < t_1 < \cdots < t_N = 1 such that the B(ti,δ)B\p{t_i, \delta} cover [0,1]\br{0, 1}. By pointwise convergence, there exists MNM \in \N such that for n>Mn > M, Fn(ti)F(ti)<ε\abs{F_n\p{t_i} - F\p{t_i}} < \epsilon for all 1iN1 \leq i \leq N. Thus, given t[0,1]t \in \br{0, 1}, there exists ii such that t[ti,ti+1]t \in \br{t_i, t_{i+1}}, and so by monotonicity of every function,

Fn(t)F(t)Fn(t)Fn(ti)+Fn(ti)F(ti)+F(ti)F(t)Fn(t)Fn(ti)+2εFn(ti+1)Fn(ti)+(F(ti+1)F(ti))+2εFn(ti+1)F(ti+1)+Fn(ti)F(ti)+2ε4ε,\begin{aligned} \abs{F_n\p{t} - F\p{t}} &\leq \abs{F_n\p{t} - F_n\p{t_i}} + \abs{F_n\p{t_i} - F\p{t_i}} + \abs{F\p{t_i} - F\p{t}} \\ &\leq F_n\p{t} - F_n\p{t_i} + 2\epsilon \\ &\leq F_n\p{t_{i+1}} - F_n\p{t_i} + \p{F\p{t_{i+1}} - F\p{t_i}} + 2\epsilon \\ &\leq \abs{F_n\p{t_{i+1}} - F\p{t_{i+1}}} + \abs{F_n\p{t_i} - F\p{t_i}} + 2\epsilon \\ &\leq 4\epsilon, \end{aligned}

so the convergence is uniform.