Spring 2017 - Problem 8

argument principle, Blaschke products

Let a1,a2,,ana_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n be n1n \geq 1 points in the disc D={z<1}\D = \set{\abs{z} < 1} (possibly with repetitions), so that the function

B(z)=j=1nzaj1ajzB\p{z} = \prod_{j=1}^n \frac{z - a_j}{1 - \conj{a_j}z}

has nn zeros in D\D. Prove that the derivative B(z)B'\p{z} has n1n - 1 zeros in D\D.

Solution.

Let φa ⁣:DD\func{\phi_a}{\D}{\D} be the Blaschke factor which maps aDa \in \D to 00. Notice that

φa(1/z)=((1/z)a1a/z)=(1azza)=1azza=1φa(z)\begin{aligned} \conj{\phi_a\p{1/\conj{z}}} = \conj{\p{\frac{\p{1/\conj{z}} - a}{1 - \conj{a/z}}}} &= \conj{\p{\frac{1 - a\conj{z}}{\conj{z} - \conj{a}}}} \\ &= \frac{1 - \conj{a}z}{z - a} \\ &= \frac{1}{\phi_a\p{z}} \end{aligned}

which gives the identity φa(z)φa(1/z)=1\phi_a\p{z}\conj{\phi_a\p{1/\conj{z}}} = 1. Thus, B(z)B(1/z)=1B\p{z}\conj{B\p{1/\conj{z}}} = 1 by multiplying all the terms together. Taking the derivative on both sides, we obtain

B(z)B(1/z)1z2B(z)B(1/z)=0,\begin{aligned} B'\p{z}\conj{B\p{1/\conj{z}}} - \frac{1}{z^2} B\p{z}\conj{B'\p{1/\conj{z}}} = 0, \end{aligned}

which tells us that if B(z)0B\p{z} \neq 0, then B(z)=0    B(1/z)=0B'\p{z} = 0 \iff B'\p{1/\conj{z}} = 0. Another calculation gives us

B(z)B(z)=j=1n1aj2(zaj)(1ajz).\frac{B'\p{z}}{B\p{z}} = \sum_{j=1}^n \frac{1 - \abs{a_j}^2}{\p{z - a_j}\p{1 - \conj{a_j}z}}.

First, assume that B(0)B(0)0B\p{0} \neq B'\p{0} \neq 0 and that BB has distinct zeroes. Multiplying the above by j=1n(zaj)(1ajz)\prod_{j=1}^n \p{z - a_j}\p{1 - \conj{a_j}z}, we get a polynomial equation P(z)=0P\p{z} = 0 of degree 2n22n - 2. Since the zeroes of BB are precisely a1,,ana_1, \ldots, a_n, PP does not vanish at any of these points, so P(z)=0    B(z)=0P\p{z} = 0 \iff B'\p{z} = 0.

Given a zero zjz_j of BB' in D\D, however, we know that B(1/zj)B'\p{1/\conj{z_j}} is a zero of BB' outside of D\D. Since BB' has 2n22n - 2 zeroes, it follows that half of them are in the disk and half are outside the disk, i.e., BB' has n1n - 1 zeroes in D\D.

In the general case, by perturbing aa in φa\phi_a, we may approximate BB uniformly on compact sets by a Blaschke product BεB_\epsilon such that Bε(0)Bε(0)0B_\epsilon\p{0} \neq B_\epsilon'\p{0} \neq 0 and the roots of BεB_\epsilon are all distinct. By the Cauchy integral formula,

B(z)Bε(z)12πB(z,r)B(ζ)Bε(ζ)ζz2dζBBεLr.\abs{B'\p{z} - B_\epsilon'\p{z}} \leq \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{\partial B\p{z,r}} \frac{\abs{B\p{\zeta} - B_\epsilon\p{\zeta}}}{\abs{\zeta - z}^2} \,\diff\zeta \leq \frac{\norm{B - B_\epsilon}_{L^\infty}}{r}.

So, it follows that BεB_\epsilon' converges uniformly to BB' on compact sets and similarly, BεB_\epsilon'' converges uniformly to BB'' on compact sets. By uniform convergence,

DB(z)B(z)dz=limkDBε(z)Bε(z)dz=n1.\int_{\partial\D} \frac{B''\p{z}}{B'\p{z}} \,\diff{z} = \lim_{k\to\infty} \int_{\partial\D} \frac{B_\epsilon''\p{z}}{B_\epsilon'\p{z}} \,\diff{z} = n - 1.

Since BB is holomorphic on D\D, it follows that BB' has no poles inside of D\D. Thus, by the argument principle, BB' has precisely n1n - 1 zeroes in D\D, which completes the proof.