Spring 2017 - Problem 7

conformal mappings, Schwarz lemma

Let f(z)f\p{z} be a one-to-one continuous mapping from the closed annulus

{1zR}\set{1 \leq \abs{z} \leq R}

onto the closed annulus

{1zS}\set{1 \leq \abs{z} \leq S}

such that ff is analytic on the open annulus {1<z<R}\set{1 < \abs{z} < R}. Prove S=RS = R.

Solution.

Denote A(r,R)={rzR}A\p{r, R} = \set{r \leq \abs{z} \leq R} and so f ⁣:A(1,R)A(1,S)\func{f}{A\p{1,R}}{A\p{1,S}} is a conformal mapping. ff maps A(1,R)\partial A\p{1, R} to A(1,S)\partial A\p{1, S}. If ff maps z=1\abs{z} = 1 to z=S\abs{z} = S, then we can post-compose ff with Sz\frac{S}{z}. This inversion maps z=S\abs{z} = S to z=1\abs{z} = 1, and so without loss of generality, we can assume that ff maps z=1\abs{z} = 1 to itself.

Consider

g(z)=1f(1/z),g\p{z} = \frac{1}{\conj{f\p{1/\conj{z}}}},

which is holomorphic via the Cauchy-Riemann equations and because ff never vanishes. Observe that if z=1\abs{z} = 1, then 1/z=z1/\conj{z} = z and so

g(z)=1f(1/z)=1f(z),=f(z).g\p{z} = \frac{1}{\conj{f\p{1/\conj{z}}}} = \frac{1}{\conj{f\p{z}}}, = f\p{z}.

Thus, ff and gg are continuous and agree at z=1\abs{z} = 1 and are holomorphic on their respective domains, they extend by the Schwarz reflection principle to a single holomorphic function A(R1,R)A(S1,S)A\p{R^{-1}, R} \to A\p{S^{-1}, S}, and we will just denote this extension as ff.

Notice that Sf(zR)Sf\p{\frac{z}{R}} is a holomorphic function A(1,R2)A(1,S2)A\p{1, R^2} \to A\p{1, S^2}, so we may repeat this argument. By induction, we obtain a holomorphic extension of ff to the interior of A(R12n,R)A(S12n,S)A\p{R^{1-2^n}, R} \to A\p{S^{1-2^n}, S} for all n1n \geq 1. Thus, ff extends to a holomorphic function B(0,R){0}B(0,S){0}B\p{0, R} \setminus \set{0} \to B\p{0, S} \setminus \set{0}. Since f(z)S\abs{f\p{z}} \leq S on the entire punctured disk, ff extends holomorphically to a holomorphic function on B(0,R)B\p{0, R}. From our extension, we know that

f(R12n)=S12nn0,\abs{f\p{R^{1-2^n}}} = S^{1-2^n} \xrightarrow{n\to\infty} 0,

so f(0)=0f\p{0} = 0, so ff is a holomorphic function B(0,R)B(0,S)B\p{0, R} \to B\p{0, S}. By applying the Schwarz lemma to 1Sf(Rz)\frac{1}{S}f\p{Rz}, we have

1Sf(Rz)z    f(z)SRz.\abs{\frac{1}{S}f\p{Rz}} \leq \abs{z} \implies \abs{f\p{z}} \leq \frac{S}{R} \abs{z}.

Setting z=R12nz = R^{1-2^n},

S12nSRR12n    S2nR2n    RS.S^{1-2^n} \leq \frac{S}{R} R^{1-2^n} \implies S^{-2^n} \leq R^{-2^n} \implies R \leq S.

Since ff is a continuous bijection from the compact space A(1,R)A\p{1, R} to the Hausdorff space A(1,S)A\p{1, S}, it is a homeomorphism. On the interior, ff is an injective holomorphic function, so by the inverse function theorem, ff is a biholomorphism on the interiors. Hence, we may apply this argument to f1 ⁣:A(1,S)A(1,R)\func{f^{-1}}{A\p{1, S}}{A\p{1, R}} to see that SRS \leq R by symmetry. Thus, S=RS = R, which completes the proof.