Fall 2017 - Problem 12

entire functions, inverse function theorem

Let ff, gg, and hh be complex-valued functions defined on C\C with

f=gh.f = g \circ h.

Show that if hh is continuous, and both ff and gg are non-constant and holomorphic, then hh is holomorphic as well.

Solution.

Let B={zCg(z)=0}B = \set{z \in \C \mid g'\p{z} = 0}. Since gg is non-constant and entire, BB must be at most countable (it can have only finitely many zeroes on any compact ball). Thus, given zCh1(B)z \in \C \setminus h^{-1}\p{B}, we see that g(h(z))0g'\p{h\p{z}} \neq 0, so gg is biholomorphic on a neighborhood UU of h(z)h\p{z}. Consequently,

h=(gU)1fh = \p{\res{g}{U}}^{-1} \circ f

on h1(U)h^{-1}\p{U}, so hh is holomorphic at zz and so holomorphic on all of Ch1(B)\C \setminus h^{-1}\p{B}.

Let zBz \in B so that g(h(z))=0g'\p{h\p{z}} = 0. Notice that f(z)=g(h(z))f\p{z} = g\p{h\p{z}}, and because ff is holomorphic near zz and gg near h(z)h\p{z}, it follows that hh must be bounded near zz. To complete the proof, we simply need to show that zz is isolated in BB.

Suppose otherwise, and that {zn}nB\set{z_n}_n \subseteq B with znz0z_n \neq z_0 converges to z0z_0. We claim that h(zn)=h(z0)h\p{z_n} = h\p{z_0} for at most finitely many nn. Otherwise, we get a subsequence h(znk)=h(z0)h\p{z_{n_k}} = h\p{z_0} and

f(znk)=g(h(znk))=g(h(z0)),f\p{z_{n_k}} = g\p{h\p{z_{n_k}}} = g\p{h\p{z_0}},

which implies that the zeroes of f(z)f(z0)f\p{z} - f\p{z_0} accumulate, which is impossible as ff is non-constant. Thus, by reindexing, we may assume that h(zn)h(z0)h\p{z_n} \neq h\p{z_0} for all nn. But this implies that g(h(zn))=0g'\p{h\p{z_n}} = 0 and g(h(z0))=0g'\p{h\p{z_0}} = 0, which means that the zeroes of gg' have an accumulation point, so gg' is constant. By assumption this means g=g(h(z0))=0g' = g'\p{h\p{z_0}} = 0, which implies gg is constant, a contradiction. Hence, no accumulation point could have existed to begin with, so BB is an isolated. By Riemann's removable singularity theorem, hh extends to an entire function, as required.