Spring 2014 - Problem 9

Hurwitz' theorem, Rouché's theorem

Prove Hurwitz' Theorem: Let ΩC\Omega \subseteq \C be a connected open set and fn,f ⁣:ΩC\func{f_n,f}{\Omega}{\C} holomorphic functions. Assume that fn(z)f_n\p{z} converges uniformly to f(z)f\p{z} on compact subsets of Ω\Omega. Prove that if fn(z)0f_n\p{z} \neq 0, zΩ\forall z \in \Omega, n\forall n, then either ff is identically equal to 00 or f(z)0f\p{z} \neq 0, zΩ\forall z \in \Omega.

Solution.

Suppose ff is not identically 00, but there exists z0Ωz_0 \in \Omega such that f(z0)=0f\p{z_0} = 0. Thus, z0z_0 is an isolated zero of ff, so there exists R>0R > 0 such that z0z_0 is the only zero of ff in B(z0,R)Ω\cl{B\p{z_0, R}} \subseteq \Omega. Hence, f(z)ε>0\abs{f\p{z}} \geq \epsilon > 0 on B(z0,R)\partial B\p{z_0, R}.

Since fnf_n converges uniformly to ff on the compact set B(z0,R)\partial B\p{z_0, R}, there exists NNN \in \N such that on B(z0,R)\partial B\p{z_0, R},

fn(z)f(z)<εf(z).\abs{f_n\p{z} - f\p{z}} < \epsilon \leq \abs{f\p{z}}.

By Rouché's theorem, ff and (fnf)+f=fn\p{f_n - f} + f = f_n have the same number of zeroes in B(z0,R)B\p{z_0, R}. But ff has one zero in this ball, and fnf_n has no zeroes by assumption, a contradiction. Hence, no zero could have existed to begin with.