Let and define for . Show that then there exists a function such that
for , i.e., is the Fourier transform of a function in .
Conversely, show that if , then there is a function such that the Fourier transform of is given by .
Set , i.e., the square of the inverse Fourier transform of . Since , it follows that as well, so . Thus,
which was what we wanted to show.
Set . Since , it follows that , so the Fourier transform is well-defined. Thus,