Let and let be a sequence of functions such that . Show that if converges almost everywhere, then converges weakly in .
The condition on the norms imply that . Let be such that so that we may view is the dual of .
Let be a weakly convergent subsequence, i.e., weakly. By assumption, pointwise as well. We claim that : if that were not the case, then by Hahn-Banach, there exists such that . But by Fatou's lemma and weak convergence,
a contradiction. Hence, any weakly convergent subsequence of converges weakly to the same limit. Now let be any subsequence. This sequence is bounded in , so by Banach-Alaoglu, it admits a weakly convergent subsequence, and by the argument above, this subsequence converges weakly to . Hence, any subsequence of admits a further subsequence which converges weakly to , and this implies that weakly.
Indeed, if that were not the case, then there exists such that or is not equal to . Without loss of generality, suppose and so there exists a subsequence such that
But this means that no further subsequence of converges weakly to , which is impossible. This completes the proof.