Fall 2011 - Problem 6

Urysohn's lemma, weak convergence

Let (X,d)\p{X, d} be a compact metric space. Let μn\mu_n be a sequence of positive Borel measures on XX that converge in the weak-* topology to a finite positive Borel measure μ\mu, that is,

XfdμnXfdμfor allfC(X).\int_X f \,\diff\mu_n \to \int_X f \,\diff\mu \quad\text{for all}\quad f \in C\p{X}.

Here, C(X)C\p{X} denotes the space of bounded continuous functions on XX. Show that

μ(K)lim supnμn(K)for all compact setsKX.\mu\p{K} \geq \limsup_{n\to\infty}\, \mu_n\p{K} \quad\text{for all compact sets}\quad K \subseteq X.
Solution.

If K=XK = X, then χK\chi_K is continuous, and so

μ(K)=XχKdμ=limnχKdμn=limnμn(K)\mu\p{K} = \int_X \chi_K \,\diff\mu = \lim_{n\to\infty} \chi_K \,\diff\mu_n = \lim_{n\to\infty} \mu_n\p{K}

by weak convergence, so we have equality. Now suppose XKX \setminus K \neq \emptyset and let

Fn={xX|d(x,K)1n}.F_n = \set{x \in X \st d\p{x, K} \geq \frac{1}{n}}.

For nn large enough, FnF_n \neq \emptyset since XKX \setminus K \neq \emptyset and because the distance between two disjoint closed sets is positive. Since xd(x,K)x \mapsto d\p{x, K} is continuous, FnF_n is closed. Hence, KK and FnF_n are disjoint closed sets, so by Urysohn's lemma, there exists a continuous function fn ⁣:X[0,1]\func{f_n}{X}{\br{0,1}} such that f(x)=1f\p{x} = 1 for xKx \in K and f(x)=0f\p{x} = 0 for xFnx \in F_n.

Set gn=min{f1,,fn}g_n = \min\,\set{f_1, \ldots, f_n}, which is continuous since it is the minimum of finitely many continuous functions. Thus, {gn}n\set{g_n}_n is a decreasing sequence of functions. Moreover, xKx \in K, then f1(x)==fn(x)=1    gn(x)=1f_1\p{x} = \cdots = f_n\p{x} = 1 \implies g_n\p{x} = 1 and if xFnx \in F_n, then gn(x)fn(x)=0g_n\p{x} \leq f_n\p{x} = 0, so gng_n still has the same separation property as the fnf_n. Finally, gnχKg_n \to \chi_K pointwise: if xKx \in K, then gn(x)=1g_n\p{x} = 1 for all n1n \geq 1. Otherwise, d(x,K)>0d\p{x, K} > 0, so there exists n1n \geq 1 such that xFnx \in F_n, and so gk(x)=0g_k\p{x} = 0 for all knk \geq n. Hence,

XgkdμnXχKdμn    Xgkdμlim supnXχKdμn,(1)\tag{1} \int_X g_k \,\diff\mu_n \geq \int_X \chi_K \,\diff\mu_n \implies \int_X g_k \,\diff\mu \geq \limsup_{n\to\infty} \int_X \chi_K \,\diff\mu_n,

since the limit on the left-hand side exists as nn \to \infty. Since gkg_k decreases to χK\chi_K, 1gk01 - g_k \geq 0 increases to χK\chi_K, so by the monotone convergence theorem,

Xgkdμ=X1(1gk)dμkμ(X)X1χKdμ=XχKdμ.\int_X g_k \,\diff\mu = \int_X 1 - \p{1 - g_k} \,\diff\mu \xrightarrow{k\to\infty} \mu\p{X} - \int_X 1 - \chi_K \,\diff\mu = \int_X \chi_K \,\diff\mu.

Thus, sending kk \to \infty in (1) and noting that the right-hand side is independent of kk,

μ(K)=XχKdμlim supnXχKdμn=lim supnμn(K)\mu\p{K} = \int_X \chi_K \,\diff\mu \geq \limsup_{n\to\infty}\int_X \chi_K \,\diff\mu_n = \limsup_{n\to\infty} \mu_n\p{K}

as required.