density argument, Riemann-Lebesgue lemma, weak convergence
Consider the following sequence of functions:
fn:[0,1]→Rbyfn(x)=exp(sin(2πnx)).
Prove that fn converges weakly in L1([0,1]).
Prove that fn converges weak-* in L∞([0,1]), viewed as the dual of L1([0,1]).
Solution.
Because [0,1] is σ-finite with respect to the Lebesgue measure, we know that (L1([0,1]))∗≃L∞([0,1]). Thus, to prove weak convergence, it suffices to show that there exists f∈L1([0,1]) such that
n→∞lim∫fngdx=∫fgdx
for any g∈L∞([0,1]). Observe that for such a g,
∥g∥L1≤∥g∥L∞m([0,1])=∥g∥L∞<∞,
so L∞([0,1])⊆L1([0,1]). We simplify the problem as follows:
Decompose g=g+−g−, where f+=max{0,g} and g−=max{0,−g}. By approximating these separately, it suffices to approximate non-negative g.
Since there exists a sequence of simple functions which increase to such a g, we may reduce to approximating simple functions, in light of the monotone convergence theorem.
Simple functions are finite linear combinations of integrable characteristic functions, so it further suffices to prove the result for characteristic functions on a measurable set of finite measure.
Finally, by regularity of the Lebesgue measure, we may reduce to an integrable characteristic function on an interval. Hence, we may assume without loss of generality that g=χ[a,b], with −∞<a<b<∞.
To emphasize the fact that fn is n1-periodic, we let
We get the inequality since fn is uniformly bounded above by exp1=e, and we transformed the third integral via the substitution x↦n(x−an) and using the fact that fn is n1-periodic. Sending n→∞, we get
Hence, if we set f=∫01exp(sin(2πx))dx, then f∈L1([0,1]) and fn→f weakly.
Notice that in (1), we proved a stronger statement: we showed that ∫fngdx→∫fgdx for any g∈L1([0,1]) instead of just g∈L∞([0,1]). This is precisely what it means for fn→f weakly-* in L∞([0,1]), so we are done.