\documentclass{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \begin{document} \noindent{\LARGE Math 117, Winter 00: Homework 1} \\ \\ \noindent {\it Remark.} The following symbols are used: \noindent $\forall$ means "for all". For example, $\forall n>2$ means "for all $n$ greater than 2". \noindent $\mathbb{N}$ is the set of natural numbers, $\{ 1,2,3,...\}$. \noindent $\mathbb{Z}$ is the set of integers, $\{ 0,\pm 1,\pm 2,...\}$. \noindent $\in$ means "is an element of", so for example $n\in \mathbb{N}$ means "$n$ is an element of $\mathbb{N}$", i.e. "$n$ is a natural number". \\ \\ \noindent {\bf 2A/E1.} Prove that $\forall n\geq 4: n!\geq 2^n.$ \\ \noindent {\it Proof.} We have to start our induction at $n=4$. Since $4!=24$ and $2^4=16$, $P(4)$ holds. Suppose $P(n)$ holds. Then $$(n+1)!=(n+1)\times n!\geq (n+1)\times 2^n>2\times 2^n=2^{n+1}.$$ Thus, $P(n+1)$ also holds. Here the first inequality is the induction assumption and the second inequality follows since $n\geq 4$, so certainly $(n+1)>2$. \\ \\ \noindent {\bf 2A/E4.} (i) Prove that $\forall n\geq 1$: $$\frac{1}{1-x}=1+x+...+x^{n-1}+\frac{x^n}{1-x}.$$ (ii) Substituting $x=2$ in (i), prove that $\forall n\geq1$: $$1+2+...+2^{n-1}=2^n-1.$$ {\it Proof.} (i) For $n=1$, the statement is that $\frac{1}{1-x}=1+\frac{x}{1-x}$, which is true. Suppose the statement holds for $n$. Then $$1+x+...+x^{n-1}+x^n+\frac{x^{n+1}}{1-x}=1+x+...+x^{n-1}+\frac{x^n-x^{n+1}}{1-x}+\frac{x^{n+1}}{1-x}$$ $$=1+x+...+x^{n-1}+\frac{x^n}{1-x}=\frac{1}{1-x}.$$ (ii) We could do this directly by induction, but it is faster and easier to substitute $x=2$ in (i). We get $$\frac{1}{1-2}=1+2+...+2^{n-1}+\frac{2^n}{1-2}$$ $$\Rightarrow -1=1+2+...+2^{n-1}-2^n$$ $$\Rightarrow 2^n-1=1+2+...+2^{n-1}.$$ {\newpage} \noindent {\bf 2A/E10.} The Tower of Hanoi \\ Here is the main idea of this problem: if you know how many moves you need to move $n$ disks from one pole to another, then you can get the number of moves for $n+1$ disks from that as follows. \\ \\ a) move the top $n$ disks to the middle pole using the third pole as the "spare". \\ \\ b) move the $(n+1)^{st}$ disk from the first pole to the third pole. \\ \\ c) move the $n$ disks from the middle pole to the third pole, using the first one as the spare this time. \\ So how many moves do you need? For 1 disk, you obviously need 1 move. If for $n$ disks you need $k$ moves, then by the above explanation you need $2k+1$ moves for $n+1$ disks ($k$ for a), 1 for b), $k$ for c)). So for two disks you need $2+1=3$, for three $2\times 3+1=7$, for four $2\times 7+1=15$ and so on. Looking at this pattern, we claim: \\ The number of moves needed to move $n$ disks is $2^n-1$. \\ \\ {\it Proof.} For 1 disk we need 1 move, so the statement is true for $n=1$. \\ Suppose now the statement holds for $n$ disks. For $n+1$ disks, we first move $n$ disks, then one disk, and then $n$ disks. The total number of moves is thus $$(2^n-1)+1+(2^n-1)=2\times 2^n-1=2^{n+1}-1.$$ Question: How many moves does it take to move $n$ disks if there are four poles? Five? Is there a general formula? \\ \\ \noindent{\bf 2A/E14.} What's wrong with the Baby Theorem? \\ When you do induction, you can only use the induction assumption on the {\bf first} $n$ elements. In the proof in the book, the set $R$ of the $n$ babies to the right includes the elements 2 through $n+1$, and we can't use our induction assumption on the $n+1^{st}$ baby. {\bf Don't assume what you're trying to prove!!} Alternatively, you could just say that in the case $n=2$, there is no overlap, so you can't compare the set $L$ and the set $R$. {\newpage} \noindent{\bf 2B/E4.} Prove that the sum of the interior angles of an $n$-sided convex polygon is $180^\circ \times (n-2)$. \\ \\ {\it Proof.} It obviously doesn't make sense to talk about an $n$-sided convex polygon if $n<3$, so we'll start at $n=3$. In this case, we have a triangle, and the sum of the interior angles is $180^\circ =180^\circ \times (3-2)$. So the statement holds for $n=3$. If it holds for all $n$-sided convex polygons, let's consider one with $n+1$ sides (and vertices). Now take any three adjacent vertices and connect the outer two with a line. What you get is an $n$-sided polygon and a triangle. Also, to add up all the interior angles of the $n+1$-sided polygon is the same as to add up all the interior angles of the $n$-sided polygon and the triangle. Thus, the sum of the interior angles of the $n+1$-sided polygon is $$180^\circ \times (n-2)+180^\circ =180^\circ \times (n-1).$$ \\ \\ \noindent{\bf 19A/E1.} Prove that the sum of the elements in the $n$th row of Pascal's triangle is $2^n$ for each $n$. How many subsets of a set with $n$ elements are there? \\ {\it Proof.} The $n$th row of Pascal's triangle consists of $\left(\begin{array}{c}n \\ 0\end{array} \right)$,$\left(\begin{array}{c}n \\ 1\end{array} \right)$,...,$\left(\begin{array}{c}n \\ n\end{array} \right)$. By the Binomial theorem, $$2^n=(1+1)^n=\left(\begin{array}{c}n \\ 0\end{array} \right)+...+\left(\begin{array}{c}n \\ n\end{array} \right).$$ By a theorem in the book (on page 294), if $S$ is a set with $n$ elements, then it has $\left(\begin{array}{c}n \\ r\end{array} \right)$ subsets with $r$ elements. Since all sizes between 0 and $n$ elements are possible for the subsets (0 would be the empty set and $n$ all of $S$), the total number of subsets is the sum we just calculated, $2^n$. Try to prove this directly by induction on the number $n$ of elements of the set (not too hard). \end{document}