\documentclass[11pt]{amsart} \usepackage{amssymb,latexsym,amscd,amsmath,amsthm} \usepackage{geometry} \usepackage{graphicx} \geometry{letterpaper,margin=1.3in} %\setlength{\textwidth}{6.5in} %\setlength{\textheight}{7.9in} %\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{0in} %\setlength{\evensidemargin}{0in} %\textheight22.2cm %\textwidth16cm %\hoffset=-1.85cm %%\voffset=-1cm %%\addtolength{\textheight}{1.8cm} %\leftmargin 3cm %\rightmargin 3cm \theoremstyle{plain} \newtheorem{thm}{Theorem} \newtheorem{lem}[thm]{Lemma} \newtheorem{remark}[thm]{Remark} \newtheorem{example}{Example} \newtheorem{cor}[thm]{Corollary} \newtheorem{prop}[thm]{Proposition} \newtheorem{conj}[thm]{Conjecture} \theoremstyle{definition} \newtheorem*{defn}{Definition} \newtheorem*{rem}{Remark} \newtheorem*{quest}{Question} \newtheorem*{eg}{Example} \newtheorem*{ack}{Acknowledgements} %New Commands% \newcommand{\R}{\mathbb{R}} \newcommand{\Z}{{\mathbb{Z}}} \newcommand{\sph}{\mathbb{S}} \newcommand{\Q}{\mathbb{Q}} \newcommand{\C}{{\mathbb{C}}} \newcommand{\F}{\mathbb{F}} \newcommand{\id}{{\rm id}} \newcommand{\im}{\operatorname{im}} \newcommand{\coker}{{\rm coker}} \newcommand{\tr}{\operatorname{tr}} \newcommand{\Ad}{{\rm Ad}} \newcommand{\ad}{{\rm ad}} \newcommand{\I}{{\bf I}} \newcommand{\rep}{\operatorname{R}} \newcommand{\pro}{\operatorname{pr}} \newcommand{\Sy}{{\rm S}} \newcommand{\T}{{\rm T}} \newcommand{\diam}{{\rm diam}} \newcommand{\comp}{{\text{ $\scriptstyle \circ$ }}} \newcommand{\pin}{{\rm Pin}} \newcommand{\aut}{{\rm Aut}} \newcommand{\inn}{{\rm Inn}} \newcommand{\out}{{\rm Out}} \newcommand{\rk}{{\rm rank}} \newcommand{\spacing}[1]{\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{#1}\large\normalsize} \spacing{1.2} \begin{document} \title{Orders For Which There Exist Exactly Two Groups} \author{Clint Givens\\ 112123752\\ Adviser: Dr. Krishnan Shankar\\ May 12, 2006} %\address{University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73069. \newline{\tt cgivens@ou.edu}} \maketitle \normalsize \thispagestyle{empty} \subsection*{\textsf{Introduction}}\hfill A long-standing problem in group theory is to determine the number of non-isomorphic groups of a given order. The inverse problem--determining the orders for which there are a given number of groups--has received considerably less attention. In this note, we will give a characterization of those positive integers $n$ for which there exist exactly $2$ distinct groups of order $n$ (up to isomorphism). We call such numbers \emph{$2$-group numbers}. Our work extends ideas from \cite{PS}. Following the authors, we say a number $n=p_1^{a_1}\cdots p_r^{a_r}$ has \emph{nilpotent factorization} if $p_i^k \not\equiv 1 \pmod{p_j}$ for all integers $i$, $j$, and $k$ with $1\leq k\leq a_i$. In other words, no prime power in the factorization is congruent to $1$ modulo any other prime in the factorization. \cite{PS} show in their paper that a number $n$ has nilpotent factorization if and only if every group of order $n$ is nilpotent. Such $n$ they call, naturally enough, \emph{nilpotent numbers}. \emph{Cyclic numbers} are those $n$ for which every group of order $n$ is cyclic, and similarly for \emph{abelian numbers}. The authors show that the cyclic numbers are precisely the square-free nilpotent numbers, and the abelian numbers are precisely the cube-free nilpotent numbers. We will see that every $2$-group number is either a square-free number that fails nilpotent factorization for exactly one pair of primes, or an abelian number with exactly one square in its prime factorization. \subsection*{\textsf{Results}}\hfill \begin{prop} \label{p2abelian} Every group of order $p^2$ is abelian. \end{prop} \begin{proof} Suppose $G$ is a non-abelian group of order $p^2$. Let $Z$ denote the center of $G$. It is well known that $Z$ cannot be trivial in a $p$-group. Since $G$ is non-abelian, $|Z|\neq p^2$, so by Lagrange's Theorem we must have $|Z| = p$. But then $|G/Z| = p$. Let $h\in G$, $h\not\in Z$. Then $G/Z = \{Z, hZ, h^2Z,\ldots,h^{p-1}Z\}$. These cosets commute with one another and with $Z$ (since it is the center), hence every element of $G$ commutes with every other, and this contradicts our assumption that $G$ was non-abelian. (This argument actually shows that $G/Z$ is never a non-trivial cyclic group.) \end{proof} Now since every group of order $p^2$ is abelian, it follows by the Classification Theorem for Finite Abelian Groups that $p^2$ is a $2$-group number for every prime $p$, the two groups being $\Z_{p^2}$ and $\Z_p\times \Z_p$. \begin{prop} If $n$ is not cube-free, then $n$ is at least a $5$-group number. \end{prop} \begin{proof} Let $p$ be a prime. We will construct $5$ distinct groups of order $p^3$. The Classification Theorem for Finite Abelian Groups tells us there are three abelian groups of order $p^3$: \begin{align*} &\Z_p\times\Z_p\times\Z_p\\ &\Z_{p^2}\times\Z_p\\ &\Z_{p^3} \end{align*} Note that if $p=2$ we also have two nonabelian groups of order $p^3$: the dihedral group $D_8$ and the quaternion group $Q_8$. We claim that the same holds for $p$ an odd prime. Recall that the center $Z$ of a $p$-group is non-trivial. So if $G$ is a nonabelian group of order $p^3$, then either $|Z| = p$ or $|Z| = p^2$. In fact, the latter case does not happen, for if so, we would have $G/Z$ cyclic of order $p$, a contradiction (see the proof of Proposition \ref{p2abelian}). So $|Z| = p$. Now, we want to form two semidirect products. For the first one, consider $\aut(\Z_{p^2})$. We know that it is isomorphic to $\Z_{p^2}^{\times}$, and a theorem of Gauss (\cite[Theorem 42]{S}) tells us that $\Z_m^{\times}$ is cyclic if and only if $m=2$, $4$, $p^k$, or $2p^k$ for some odd prime $p$ and $k\geq 1$. Since this is the case here, we have $\aut(\Z_{p^2})\simeq \Z_{p^2-p}$, and, because $\aut(\Z_{p^2})$ is cyclic, it will have exactly one subgroup $H$ of order $p$. Hence we may map $\Z_p$ nontrivially into $H$ by sending a fixed generator $g$ of $\Z_p$ into any generator of $H$. This gives a semidirect product $\Z_{p^2}\rtimes \Z_p$ of order $p^3$. For the second semidirect product, look at $\aut(\Z_p\times \Z_p)$. We may also view $\Z_p\times \Z_p$ as $GL_2(\F_p)$ the $2$-dimensional vector space over $\F_p$, the finite field with $p$ elements. It has order $(p^2-1)(p^2-p) = p(p-1)^2(p+1)$. By Cauchy's Theorem, then, it has a subgroup of order $p$. Mapping a generator of $\Z_p$ into this subgroup gives another semidirect product, $(\Z_p\times\Z_p)\rtimes\Z_p$ of order $p^3$. Now in the general case where $n = p^3 m$, we have at least five distinct groups: \begin{align*} &\Z_p\times\Z_p\times\Z_p\times\Z_m\\ &\Z_{p^2}\times\Z_p\times\Z_m\\ &\Z_{p^3}\times\Z_m\\ &(\Z_{p^2}\rtimes\Z_p)\times\Z_m\\ &[(\Z_p\times\Z_p)\rtimes\Z_p]\times\Z_m. \end{align*} \end{proof} We would now like to limit the possibilities for $2$-group numbers further, namely to $n$ which are \emph{almost square-free}, by which we mean numbers which are either square-free or whose prime factorization contains just one square. \begin{prop} If the prime factorization of $n$ contains two distinct squares, then $n$ is at least a $4$-group number. \end{prop} \begin{proof} Let $n = p^2 q^2 m$, where $p$ and $q$ are primes and $m\geq 1$ is an integer. If $p|m$ or $q|m$, then $n$ is not cube-free, and hence at least a $5$-group number. So assume $(p,m) = (q,m) = 1$. Then we may write four distinct abelian groups: \begin{align*} &\Z_p\times\Z_p\times\Z_q\times\Z_q\times\Z_m\\ &\Z_{p^2}\times\Z_q\times\Z_q\times\Z_m\\ &\Z_p\times\Z_p\times\Z_{q^2}\times\Z_m\\ &\Z_{p^2}\times\Z_{q^2}\times\Z_m. \end{align*} Again, glancing at orders of elements convinces one that these groups are distinct. \end{proof} \begin{rem} It is possible for an $n$ with two distinct squares in its factorization to be exactly a $4$-group number. This will happen if and only if $n$ has nilpotent factorization: if it does, then it is an abelian number, and the above groups are the only groups of order $n$; and if it does not, then there are the above groups plus at least one non-nilpotent group. An example of an $n$ with exactly $4$ groups is $n = 5^2 7^2 = 1125$. (This is by no means, however, the smallest $4$-group number.) \end{rem} We are almost ready for the characterization of $2$-group numbers; we just need one more well-known result as a lemma. The proof is elementary, but relatively involved, so we will omit it here. For details, see \cite[Example 10.46]{V}. \begin{lem} Let $G$ be a finite group of order $|G|=n$, and let $p$ be the smallest prime dividing $n$. If $G$ contains a subgroup $H$ of index $p$, then $H\trianglelefteq G$. \end{lem} Now, at last, we come to the classification of $2$-group numbers. \begin{thm} $n$ is a $2$-group number if and only if one of the following holds:\\ (1) $n$ is square-free, and fails to have nilpotent factorization for exactly one pair of primes; or\\ (2) $n=p^2 q_1\cdots q_r$ where $p, q_1,\ldots,q_r$ are distinct primes (we allow $r=0$, in which case $n = p^2$) and $n$ is an abelian number (which means $n$ has nilpotent factorization). \end{thm} \begin{proof} We have already seen that $n$ must be almost square-free. Suppose first that $n$ is, in fact, square-free. If $n$ fails to have nilpotent factorization in more than one way, then, following the method of Pakianathan and Shankar, we may construct two nonisomorphic, non-nilpotent groups of order $n$. Together with $\Z_n$, this gives three groups already. So we need to show that if $n$ fails to have nilpotent factorization in exactly one way, then there are only two groups of order $n$: namely, $\Z_n$ and \[ (\Z_{p_1}\rtimes \Z_{p_2})\times \Z_m, \] where $m= n/p_1 p_2$. (This being the non-nilpotent group given by the method in \cite{PS}.) The difficulty will be showing that there is precisely one non-abelian group of order $n$. This we will do using induction on $r$, the number of prime factors of $n$. The first case is with $r=2$. Let $G$ be a non-abelian group of order $n = pq$ for some primes $p, q$ with $p\equiv 1\pmod{q}$. By the lemma, a Sylow $p$-subgroup is normal, hence unique. Call it $N$, and let $H$ be any Sylow $q$-subgroup. Since $p$ and $q$ are prime, it follows from Lagrange's Theorem that $N\cap H = \{1\}$. Also, $NH$ is a subgroup of order \[ |NH| = \frac{|N||H|}{|N\cap H|} = pq = n, \] so in fact $NH = G$. We can then write $G$ as an (internal) semidirect product $G=N\rtimes H$. Moreover, we claim any two such semidirect products are isomorphic. If this is the case, we will have shown there is exactly one non-abelian group of order $n=pq$. In fact, it will be helpful later on to understand $\aut(G)$, so we will investigate its structure now, and on the way see that the claim is true. Let $n_q$ denote the number of Sylow $q$-subgroups of $G$. Then by the Sylow theorems, we know that $n_q\equiv 1\pmod{q}$ and $n_q|p$. However, $n_q$ cannot equal $1$, since this would mean $H$ was normal, and then we would have $G=N\times H$ a direct product of cyclic groups, contradicting $G$ non-abelian. Thus there are exactly $p$ Sylow $q$-subgroups. Fix $n$ and $h$, generators for $N\simeq\Z_p$ and $H\simeq\Z_q$ respectively. Recalling that every element of a semidirect product $N\rtimes H$ can be written uniquely as the product of an element of $N$ with one of $H$, we see that every element of $G$ can be uniquely written in the form $n^a h^b$ for some $a,b$ satisfying $0\leq a\leq p-1$ and $0\leq b\leq q-1$. Let $\phi\in\aut(G)$. Since $\phi$ fixes orders of elements, it must map $n\mapsto n^s$ and $h\mapsto\tilde{h}$ where $1\leq s\leq p-1$ and $\tilde{h}$ is a generator for some Sylow $q$-subgroup. In this case for a typical element $n^a h^b\in G$ we have \begin{align*} \phi(n^a h^b) &= \phi(n)^a\phi(h)^b\\ &=(n^s)^a \tilde{h}^b\\ &=(n^a)^s \tilde{h}^b \end{align*} Not every such map will give an automorphism, however; to see which ones do, we note that $\phi$ is a homomorphism, so we must have \[ \phi(n^a h^b n^{a'} h^{b'})=\phi(n^a h^b)\phi(n^{a'}h^{b'}) \] for all $a,a',b,b'\in\Z$. Using $\phi(n^a h^b)=(n^a)^s \tilde{h}^b$ and the fact that $h^b n^{a'} h^{-b}\in N$ (since $N$ is normal), we obtain for the LHS: \begin{align*} \phi(n^a h^b n^{a'} h^{b'}) &= \phi(n^a h^b n^{a'} h^{-b} h^b h^{b'})\\ &= \phi(n^a h^b n^{a'} h^{-b} h^{b+b'})\\ &= (n^a h^b n^{a'} h^{-b})^s \tilde{h}^{b+b'}\\ &= n^{as} (h^b n^{a'} h^{-b})^s \tilde{h}^{b+b'}\\ &= n^{as} h^b n^{a's} h^{-b} \tilde{h}^{b+b'}. \end{align*} The RHS gives \begin{align*} \phi(n^a h^b)\phi(n^{a'}h^{b'}) &= n^{as}\tilde{h}^{b}n^{a's}\tilde{h}^{b'}\\ &=n^{as}\tilde{h}^{b}n^{a's}\tilde{h}^{-b}\tilde{h}^{b}\tilde{h}^{b'}\\ &=n^{as}\tilde{h}^{b}n^{a's}\tilde{h}^{-b}\tilde{h}^{b+b'}. \end{align*} Canceling where possible, we see that the LHS=RHS if and only if \begin{align*} & \ \ \ \ h^b n^{a's} h^{-b} = \tilde{h}^{b}n^{a's}\tilde{h}^{-b}\\ \Longleftrightarrow &\ \ \ \ \tilde{h}^{-b} h^b n^{a's} = n^{a's}\tilde{h}^{-b} h^b, \end{align*} which says precisely that $\tilde{h}^{-b} h^b$ and $n^{a's}$ commute. But this means that $\tilde{h}^{-b} h^b$ is in the centralizer subgroup $Z(n^{a's})$, and since $G$ is non-abelian, we must have simply $Z(n^{a's}) = N$. This shows that $\phi$ is a homomorphism if and only if $\tilde{h}^{-b} h^b\in N$, for all $b\in\Z$. We now claim this inclusion holds for all $b$ if and only if it holds for $b=1$. Another way of saying this is that, if $\tilde{h}^{-1} = n^{\ell} h^{-1}$ for some $\ell$, then $\tilde{h}^{-b} h^b\in N$ for all $b$. Simply induct on $b$: if $\tilde{h}^{-b} = n^k h^{-b}$ for some $k\in N$, then multiply on the left by $\tilde{h}^{-1} = n^{\ell} h^{-1}$ to obtain \begin{align*} \tilde{h}^{-1}\tilde{h}^{-b} &= n^{\ell} h^{-1} n^k h^{-b}\\ &= n^{\ell} h^{-1} n^k h h^{-1} h^{-b}, \end{align*} which shows that $\tilde{h}^{-(b+1)} h^{b+1}\in N$. So now we know that $\phi$ is a homomorphism if and only if there is some $\ell\in\Z$ such that $\tilde{h}^{-1}=n^{\ell}h^{-1}$. But since each element of $G$ has a unique representation as $n^a h^b$, then for a given $\ell$ ($0\leq\ell\leq p-1$), this equation uniquely determines an $\tilde{h}$ for which the map $\phi$ is a homomorphism sending $n\mapsto n^s$ and $h\mapsto \tilde{h}=(n^{\ell}h^{-1})^{-1}$. So finally we can count the number of possible automorphisms: we can pick any $s$ with $0\leq s\leq p-1$, and any $\ell$ with $0\leq\ell\leq p-1$, for a total of $p(p-1)$ choices. So $|\aut(G)| = p(p-1)$. Note also that we can send $h$ to a member of any Sylow $q$-subgroup we like. This shows that each of the internal semidirect products mentioned above is isomorphic, because the construction depends only on the Sylow $q$-subgroup $H$ chosen, and this completes the base case of the induction (at last!). Having shown that $n=pq$ is a $2$-group number if and only if it fails nilpotent factorization, now assume $n=p_1\cdots p_r$ is the product of three or more distinct primes and fails nilpotent factorization for exactly one pair. Relabeling if necessary, we may assume the failing pair is $p_1$ and $p_2$, with $p_2\equiv 1\pmod{p_1}$. To complete the induction, we need to show there is exactly one non-abelian group of order $n$. The argument here turns out to require rather more sophisticated tools, so we will simply cite the results we need rather than giving a full development. First, it is well known that every group of square-free order is solvable (see, for instance, \cite[10.1.10]{R}--the proof relies on a tool called the transfer). We will also use a theorem of P. Hall (\cite[9.1.7]{R}) which says that if $G$ is a finite solvable group, $|G| = n$, and $k$ is any divisor of $n$ such that $\gcd(k,n/k) = 1$, then $G$ contains a subgroup of order $k$, and any two such subgroups are conjugate. Now consider two cases: first, suppose $p_1$ is the smallest prime dividing $n$. Then, by Hall's theorem, we know there is a subgroup $H$ of index $p_1$. Since $H$ is square-free with nilpotent factorization, it is cyclic, $H\simeq\Z_{p_2}\times\cdots\times\Z_{p_r}$. In particular, $H$ is normal so we may form an (internal) semidirect product $\Z_{p_1}\rtimes H$. Now consider the automorphism group of $H$. Since any automorphism preserves orders of elements, given any direct product whose factors have relatively prime orders, the group of automorphisms is simply the direct product of the automorphism groups of the factors. In this case, \[ \aut(H) \simeq \aut{(\Z_{p_2})}\times\cdots\times\aut{(\Z_{p_r})}. \] Since the $p_i$'s are prime, their automorphism groups are cyclic of order $p_i - 1$. By assumption, $p_1|p_i-1$ if and only if $i=2$. So the only way we may form a non-trivial semidirect product $\Z_{p_1}\rtimes H$ is by mapping $\Z_{p_1}$ into the unique $p_1$-subgroup of the cyclic group $\aut(\Z_{p_2})$, which gives exactly one non-abelian group of order $n$. In the second case, $p_1$ is not the smallest prime dividing $n$. Necessarily $p_1 < p_2$, as $p_2\equiv 1\pmod{p_1}$; hence the smallest prime is neither of these. Say it's $p_3$. Again, by Hall's theorem and the lemma, we know there is a normal subgroup $H$ of index $p_3$, so we can form an (internal) semidirect product $\Z_{p_3}\rtimes H$. Now by induction there are exactly $2$ groups of order $n/p_3$, the cyclic group and one group $G$ given by a semidirect product, so $H$ must be one of these. If $H$ is cyclic, then the semidirect product $\Z_{p_3}\rtimes H$ must be trivial, since $\aut(H)$ does not have a subgroup of order $p_3$. This trivial semidirect product gives one group of order $n$, namely $\Z_n$. The other possibility is that \[ H = (\Z_{p_1}\rtimes \Z_{p_2})\times\Z_{p_4}\times\cdots\times\Z_{p_r}. \] But in this case, since the automorphism group of a direct product is the direct product of the automorphism groups (as long as the groups' orders are relatively prime!), we have \[ \aut(H) = \aut(\Z_{p_1}\rtimes \Z_{p_2})\times\aut(\Z_{p_4})\times\cdots\times\aut(\Z_{p_r}). \] Here is where it's useful to know that $|\aut(H)| = p(p-1)$, as this means $|\aut(H)|$ is not divisible by $p_3$. In particular, the semidirect product $\Z_{p_3}\rtimes H$ must again be trivial, so that actually \[ \Z_{p_3}\rtimes H=(\Z_{p_1}\rtimes\Z_{p_2})\times\Z_{p_3}\times\cdots\times\Z_{p_r}. \] This is precisely the semidirect product from \cite{PS}, and since these are the only two groups possible, $n$ is indeed a $2$-group number. In terms of our goal of classifying the $2$-group numbers, this leaves only the relatively trivial case where $n$ is not square-free. Indeed, in this case we know from previous work that $n=p^2 q_1\cdots q_r$ with $p, q_1,\ldots,q_r$ distinct primes. Put $m = q_1\cdots q_r$. The Classification Theorem for finite abelian groups gives us two abelian groups of order $n$: \begin{align*} & \Z_p\times \Z_p\times \Z_m\ \ \ \textrm{and}\\ & \Z_{p^2}\times Z_m\ \end{align*} If $n$ is an abelian number, then these are precisely all the groups of order $n$, so $n$ is indeed a $2$-group number. Conversely, if $n$ is not an abelian number, then there is some non-abelian group of order $n$ as well, so $n$ is not a $2$-group number. This completes the proof. \end{proof} \begin{ack} The author would like to thank Dr.\ Krishnan Shankar of the University of Oklahoma for many invaluable discussions. \end{ack} %\bibliographystyle{alpha}{ABcd} \begin{thebibliography}{PS} \bibitem[PS]{PS} %[PS00] J.\ Pakianathan and K.\ Shankar, \textit{Nilpotent Numbers}, Amer. Math. Monthly, August--September 2000, 631--634. \bibitem[R]{R} Derek J.S.\ Robinson, \textit{A Course in the Theory of Groups, 2nd ed.}, New York, Springer-Verlag, 1996. \bibitem[S]{S} Daniel Shanks, \textit{Solved and Unsolved Problems in Number Theory}, Washington D.C., Spartan, 1962. \bibitem[V]{V} E.B.\ Vinberg, \textit{A Course in Algebra}, Providence, RI, Amer. Math. Soc., 2001. \end{thebibliography} \end{document}