In Reply to: more week2 missing parentheses posted by Alex on January 31, 2003 at 17:09:10:
>the first definition on pg 14 of week2's notes, there is a missing a closing parenthese after "(...be two sequence, and let epislon >0." and on pg 23 of week2's notes the definition of reciprocal near the bottom is missing a closing parenthese after "(From Lemma 16 we know that x^-1 is a real number."
Dear Alex,
The first error was pointed out already by Twistorstrings
on Jan 13... but thanks for the second correction!
Terry